Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Using equations to define non-math subjects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Using equations to define non-math subjects

    My true nerd shall shine through in the following post. I made the first equation today, for no reason. The second equation I made a long time ago, for no reason. Not sure if I shared the second with you already, sorry if I did. The first equation is by no means done, and will change many more time in my life. I'm open to suggestions on the first, the second I'm not to interested in keeping updated. I made it when I was like 14.

    X = L
    L =(C-F)/(M-l+f)
    C = ΩT
    F = t/Ω
    M = αN
    α = mi
    m = -Ω/(T-t)
    i = -Ω2/(T2-t2)
    N = -l
    l = (ΩC)/m
    f = mαt

    X = Who I Am
    L = The sum of my life
    C = Correct Knowledge
    F = False Knowledge
    M = mistakes I've made
    l = lesson I've learned
    T = truth I am taught
    Ω = My Logic
    t = falses i am taught
    α = my error
    N = my naivety
    i = others ignorance
    m = my own ignorance
    f = Flase lessons learned

    ----------------------------------------


    G = B this is a perfect relationship.


    ∟is equal to a division sign
    B can be substituted for G and vice versa.
    B = Boy
    G = Girl

    G ≤ (P - L) + (C + L +/- m)t
    Where C is commitment to the girl, L is the loyalty to the girl, and SOMETIME(this isn't always a factor) plus or minus m for money, times time. P is for personality and L is for looks, though sometimes(rarely) L is not as serious of a factor. In these cases L = L∟2 or a higher integer depending on the female.

    Ussually B = P +/- L you can't have a lasting relationship with someone with a good personality.

    L = (+/- W +/- H)A
    L is looks,W is weight, and H is height, these two vary from person to person, A is attractiveness.

    P = (c +/- s + IX) •/∟ S
    P is personality, c is conversation, and s is similarity, some people want opposites while others want similar people. I are similar interests that the people share, you must have something in common to sustain a relationship, X is the number of things they have in common. S is a very odd variable it comes and goes as it is VERY wide in it's functions, S equals sex some reltionships can either be saved or broken on this factor alone sometimes, other times it can be left out altogether.

    I'd explain m, but it's pretty self-explanetory.

    t ≤ r - T

    T is the ammount of time spent over what G wants, r is the ammount of time that is perfect to spend on G.

    A relationship can last if:
    B ≥ (P +/- L)+(C + L +/- m)t

    So, when it comes down to it, relationships are complex, hard, and cause a lot of trouble.
    ---------------------------------

    Have you ever used math to define something abstract like this? Or perhaps I just think about things far too much for my own good.
    Grow!

    #2
    Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

    You = Not cool.

    Have you ever used math to define something abstract like this?
    Why, yes I have.
    Ryner's Games

    Simple Man's Quest for the Playground* - Winner: Pavilionite Biography Contest - Click Here!

    Monster Must Die - Winner: Halloween Horror Contest - Click Here!

    All you need to play is a computer, no outside program necessary!

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

      Would you mind sharing?

      Oh, and you're just jealous.
      Grow!

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

        Would you mind sharing?
        Certainly.

        You = Not cool.
        Ryner's Games

        Simple Man's Quest for the Playground* - Winner: Pavilionite Biography Contest - Click Here!

        Monster Must Die - Winner: Halloween Horror Contest - Click Here!

        All you need to play is a computer, no outside program necessary!

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

          ****, I walked right into that.
          Grow!

          Comment


            #6
            Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

            I never do anything like that outside of class. Seems too nerdy, even for me.
            PSN: KingJamos

            Add me... I'll wait.

            Comment


              #7
              Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

              Well we all know that

              Lollipops * rainbows = Skittles!


              Proof:
              http://www.pavilionboards.com/forum/...ttles+rainbows
              Everything is a Riemann sum of a lot of nothing.

              Comment


                #8
                Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

                That is the lamest ****ing...

                My god man.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

                  H = Ha
                  I = Is
                  M = Much
                  N = Nds
                  O = On
                  P = Post
                  R = Pr
                  T = Th
                  V = Ve
                  X = Time
                  Y = Your

                  Here's my formula:

                  (Y - 1) = (T + I) + P + I + (R + O*2 + F) + U + (H + V) + 2 + M + X + O + Y + (H + N)

                  First one to figure it out gets a rep from me

                  Anyways, nice post...you had me confuzzled shortly after "My true nerd shall shine through"....

                  EDIT: Pervs replying to my thread....
                  Last edited by JPS; 03-02-2007, 05:12 AM.

                  Here I come Pav, like the Kool-Aid man barging into a funeral! Oh yeah!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

                    I know this is not eactly it, but I get something like,

                    You=This post is pron...something something....you have too much time on your hands.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

                      Originally posted by Perversion View Post
                      I know this is not eactly it, but I get something like,

                      You=This post is pron...something something....you have too much time on your hands.
                      lol the pr + o*2 + f is proof, but yes, close enough

                      Here I come Pav, like the Kool-Aid man barging into a funeral! Oh yeah!

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

                        Yes, he had too much time on his hands, but then again so did you for making a rebus of sorts out of your response...

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

                          lol its 4am and im tired, thats my excuse

                          Here I come Pav, like the Kool-Aid man barging into a funeral! Oh yeah!

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

                            B= Blackberry's coolness
                            P= Pavilion's coolness

                            B > P

                            Q.E.D.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Re: Using equations to define non-math subjects

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X