Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Health care bill passed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Re: Health care bill passed

    Originally posted by Sampson View Post
    This might blow your mind Marcus, but maybe we could *gasp* shrink the military?

    Ya'know, since the military is large and powerful enough to defend against an invasion from all the other armies on the face of the earth combined, I figure it could be reduced in size.

    I'll get to healthcare comments later...
    And maybe this will blow your mind but 1.5 million people are employed by the Armed Forces and an incalculable number (tens of millions) federal government workers and private contractors make a living through the military. People don't seem to understand that the military is a job like everything else and if you cut back a job it shouldn't take a genius to realize that people get removed. Military spending isn't 100% thrown at actual combat expenditures. Most of the money actually goes to health care, food, living conditions, benefits like college expenses (whoa join the military and have college, loans, and housing paid off I thought it was all fighting and killing brown people ololololol) and retirement for military employees.

    America's spending ratio on military resources is equal with that of the rest of the world based on income and spending and even then America spends more money on the living aspects than combat. If anything we should spend more because the military creates thousands of jobs outside of the actual branches. Even something as simple as a local medical clinic is contracted by the federal government when in need. Other countries like the Philippines and India actually look forward to the military for humanitarian relief and a massive boost in income. Imagine you're making 5 grand a year and suddenly 6,000 people show up on your doorstep with money in their hands. Holy ****.

    Edit: God dammit, I'm mad now. I can't blame people for not knowing where military spending goes because the media does a terrible job covering the armed forces. Whenever you hear "Federal government increases military spending" they immediately show stock footage of dudes walking through the desert and bombs going off. The media doesn't seem to care that military employees are human beings like everyone else who have basic human needs like food, clothing, and shelter. Contrary to stereotypes, the government doesn't want idiots joining so they offer training. The government wants members to leave as productive, tax paying members of society so they offer tuition assistance and per diem if you're going to college. The government wants to keep morale high and a big factor is home life so they ensure your wife, kids, immediate family, and housing is up to par with the rest of the country. The government doesn't want starvin' marvin's so they feed your ass or ensure you buy adequate meals every month.

    I can't even calculate this but I'd say it costs $10,000 to put one person through boot camp. An E1 fresh out of basic gets paid about $20,000 a year flat base pay. If he's giving housing, clothing, and food expenses then he's looking at another $15,000. He gets out after one enlistment and has his GI bill which covers $30,000 of tuition (that's bare minimum, now it's almost double that) and books plus he gets per diem based on the highest living cost of the state he's going to college in. A dude who signs up for one enlistment costs the military more than $100,000 total. Multiply that by 2 million and suddenly that $400 billion dollars spent on the military every year begins to make sense. I didn't even factor in the $400,000 your family gets if you die, the extra money you get to support dependents, retirement, the cost of moving you or your family if your duty station changes, health benefits, and all that ****. The military is beginning to find extra reasons to kick people out because it's waaaaay cheaper to get fresh faces than it is to support someone for a 20 year career and give them retirement + medical benefits for the rest of their life.

    Very, very, very, very, very little money actually gets spent on weapons like people think. There was even a scandal a few years back about terrible living conditions in some bases because money is so tight from cut backs. Last year people had to pay out of their pockets to move their families because of the sudden drop in spending. There was another scandal involving vehicles reinforced with cheap ply wood and a lack of basic equipment. Most of our weapons are decades old or being phased out of service because they're absolutely terrible.

    Alright, rant over. I've vented enough.
    Last edited by marcus; 03-23-2010, 12:16 AM.

    Comment


      #47
      Re: Health care bill passed

      I'm well aware that when one looks at military spending as a percentage of GDP, the US appears more normal and not grossly obscene.

      But why not take that as an opportunity to spend substantially less than 2.8% and allocate the funds elsewhere? Do you really have to be spending, in absolute numbers, over 6 times more than China, a country that has over 4 times your population?

      It just seems absurd and excessive to me. Why not inject some of those funds into secondary education, where the US only ranks average in comparison to other developed countries? I have friends who are high school teachers in the US and they constantly talk about how miserly they have to be on their salaries -- how come they aren't recipients to these government-funded financial cushions that those involved with the military get? Are teachers just not as important?

      I find it baffling. But that's just meeeee.

      EDIT: Hmm...From the source I found, the CIA World Factbook, the US spends 4.06% of GDP on the military. France, by comparison, spends 2.60%. Russia, 3.90%.
      Last edited by Sejon; 03-23-2010, 12:50 AM.

      Comment


        #48
        Re: Health care bill passed

        You don't understand economics at all.

        A military "job" is not a job in the normal sense--it is a burden. It doesn't contribute anything tangible to the economy, only takes away. You have to tax workers to pay that soldier to do something that has no economic value. Thus, for every military job, you're actually destroying productive jobs in other parts of the economy. (If you remember 1984, Orwell talks about how the governments in his fictional world purposely spend as much money as possible on the military to make sure that their citizens remain constantly poor)

        So don't use the "you can't get rid of the military--you're destroying jobs!" line because its not true. The economy and our society would be much better off without a military. Unfortunately, there are evil people and some amount of armed forces is necessary, but the more you have the worse off you are.

        Comment


          #49
          Re: Health care bill passed

          I dunno Sampson, by saying he doesn't economics at all it makes you seem like you're full of ****. I think it's pretty silly to say that military jobs have no economic benefit when you have folks like engineers employed by the military.



          Don't copy that floppy!

          Comment


            #50
            Re: Health care bill passed

            Originally posted by Sivart View Post
            I dunno Sampson, by saying he doesn't economics at all it makes you seem like you're full of ****. I think it's pretty silly to say that military jobs have no economic benefit when you have folks like engineers employed by the military.
            You too, don't understand. So I shall go further.

            Lets take theoretical engineer and call him Bob. Bob graduates and has two potential job offerings. He can work for the military and design missiles, or he can go work for Sony and design TVs.

            Now, Bob is a very good engineer. Whatever he works on he can tremendously improve. He decides to take the military job. After a few years of work, missiles are much better, more accurate, capable of causing more death.

            Or, he can decide to take the job with Sony. After a few years there, he discovers a way to make flat panel TVs for 50% less than before. Flat panels plummet in cost and now every American has one.

            Which would you prefer? More deadly missiles or better electronics? Remember, all resources--including people--are limited. If you employ a person in the military that person can't work in the private sector. Since the private sector produces goods that people actually want and the military doesn't, society is better off having more resources in the private sector.

            Comment


              #51
              Re: Health care bill passed

              Originally posted by Leish View Post
              Wait, I don't get it. When did the Democrats grow a pair?
              They didn't really. They just rammed this behemoth through because primaries are coming up and they want a nice victory to rally the liberal voters. Also if they waited too long it would stretch into the general election season and they want to pass the bill long enough before that hoping the voters will forget by fall and that maybe in the intervening months some scandal will erupt to weaken the Republicans or something.

              This could still cost them big time. There's a lot of misinformation that they haven't effectively cleared up which has some voters angry. They also don't seem to notice that independant voters are at best wary of this bill, and many are opposed. A lot of independant voters wanted both parties to work together on the bill but that didn't happen, and both parties were at fault. The independant voters are sick of the bickering and want to see centrist policies, but the Democrats are largely just pandering to their base.

              Originally posted by Biggie View Post
              Aaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhyeeeeeeaaaaahhhh i'm staying out of this one.
              I probably should have too, but the whole political atmosphere has me ****** and I feel a need to vent.
              Octagon Games
              Games by orius


              Comment


                #52
                Re: Health care bill passed

                Holy ****, Sampson, you are literally the most ignorant person on this forum if you honestly think the military doesn't create jobs. You just spit in the face of literally millions of factory workers, private contractors, and federal employees. Even China produces industry for the American military and armed forces all over the world. If you honestly think the military has no economic or industrial value, then I want you to take your internet modem, medicine, car, and any device that uses a satellite or tracking system and toss it out the window because I guarantee you 90% of the technology you use on a daily basis was first invented, tested, and used for military application.

                You, Sampson, have the most juvenile and elementary outlook of the world and world economics. The fact that you compare Orwell's dictorship fictional society to the real world democratic republic is bad enough, but you honestly insinuate that military spending is ruining the economy and making people poor. America, the richest country in the world with one of the lowest poverty and unemployment rates, one of the lowest tax rates in the world (try going to any European country and spending up to 20% on taxes) and the highest ppp is making people poor on military expenditures. Are you serious? MAKING PEOPLE POOR??? I can't even tell if you're trolling just now. This whole topic is absolutely terrible.

                But why not take that as an opportunity to spend substantially less than 2.8% and allocate the funds elsewhere? Do you really have to be spending, in absolute numbers, over 6 times more than China, a country that has over 4 times your population?
                For the same reason that other countries spend just as much as America. Every developed country makes majority of its money through industry and the military is 100% industry. If you make even the slightest cutback then you immediately remove thousands of people who both make a living from being employed by the government and the private contractors who work on government equipment.

                Fong Wong's Piston Greasers, a small business in Taiwan run by four family members, could very well be contracted to work on government vehicles in the area. If you cut back on military spending then you just killed their business.

                China's per capita is also 75% less than the average Americans. If you should point the finger at anyone for making the people poor then it's China for spending so much money when the average citizen lives off in a year what an American makes in a month.
                Last edited by marcus; 03-23-2010, 12:57 AM.

                Comment


                  #53
                  Re: Health care bill passed

                  Yeah, because every engineer employed by the milatary makes death rays and nukes.



                  Don't copy that floppy!

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Re: Health care bill passed

                    A military "job" is not a job in the normal sense--it is a burden.
                    ... Not really. In many ways it's like a midway between high school and a college/career. It helps set kids up with tuition, extra skills, not to mention discipline, leadership, etc. And then they go on to lead productive lives (unless they decide to stay in the military for life).

                    Really, I think all 18 yr olds should be forced through one session of basic training. They'd have the choice afterwards to keep on in the military, benefits and all, or continue about their business. There'd be less need to spend money on military advertising, and the experience would help craft healthier, more responsible young adults (oh look I just solved health care AND the job crisis, woo).

                    Edit: now, if America was run like Dwarf Fortress, then yes, military is a big burden, and mostly unnecessary if your fortress is well-guarded.
                    Last edited by Denmo; 03-23-2010, 01:09 AM.
                    ...and that's why.

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Re: Health care bill passed

                      Every developed country makes majority of its money through industry and the military is 100% industry.
                      If that's the case, how about this then: inject more funds into NASA. Aren't they 100% industry and responsible for breakthough technologies? Maybe then they'd stop using rickety space shuttles that should have been put out of commission decades ago? :-P

                      Not once have I said that military spending is making Americans poor. Coming from someone who grew up in a third-world country, any such allegation would be laughable on my part. But I do think that bloated military spending by any country that has already established preponderance hearkens back to a Cold War mentality that is now largely antiquated. Referring back to the space industry, couldn't humans be on frickin' Mars by now with all that money? Wouldn't travelling to another planet push ingenuity much farther than new tracking capabilities for missiles?

                      I don't share Sampson's position that the military has absolutely no economic worth and is a dead-end. However, I feel there could be alternatives out there that are just as worthwhile, if not more so, that could receive some of that spending, despite the fact that they're not necessarily important or practical in an immediate military context.

                      EDIT: Eh, this is going to be my last post on the matter. Firstly, I think the original topic has just been completely hi-jacked. Secondly, I'm not American, and thus my stance, at the end of the day, is that you guys can spend your money in whatever way you damn well want -- makes no difference to me. I'm just debating on this for the sake of getting a rounder picture. And because, as a long-time space-enthusiast, America has squashed all my pipe dreams that it would have made considerably more headway in space exploration by now than it has, and I'm subsequently depressed and embittered for it.
                      Last edited by Sejon; 03-23-2010, 01:35 AM.

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Re: Health care bill passed

                        Originally posted by Sejon Sol View Post
                        If that's the case, how about this then: inject more funds into NASA. Aren't they 100% industry and responsible for breakthough technologies? Maybe then they'd stop using rickety space shuttles that should have been put out of commission decades ago? :-P

                        Not once have I said that military spending is making Americans poor. Coming from someone who grew up in a third-world country, any such allegation would be laughable on my part. But I do think that bloated military spending by any country that has already established preponderance hearkens back to a Cold War mentality that is now largely antiquated. Referring back to the space industry, couldn't humans be on frickin' Mars by now with all that money? Wouldn't travelling to another planet push ingenuity much farther than new tracking capabilities for missiles?

                        I don't share Sampson's position that the military has absolutely no economic worth and is a dead-end. However, I feel there could be alternatives out there that are just as worthwhile, if not more so, that could receive some of that spending, despite the fact that they're not necessarily important or practical in an immediate military context.
                        Because the government requires larger and more broad fields. How many requirements does NASA have? You have the guys that design the shuttles, the guys that supply the fuel, the guys that repair the electronics, etc. Now look at the entirety of the world's armed forces. Weapons, vehicles, ships, planes, engineering, architecture, microelectronics, radar, medicine, food, fuel, logistics... I would need a dictionary sized book to list the jobs and sources required to run even the smallest developed country's armed forces.

                        You might think some of the technologies are worthless but military research is sold or donated to research when it becomes obsolete. Vehicles like cars and helicopters have seen their greatest innovations in a military field. Modern firefighting and medical rescue techniques were developed in military fields. Vaccines and medicine are usually funded and tested by the government for use on people overseas. I don't want American troops in foreign soil fighting for absolutely no reason either but to say it's a burden or has no use is incredibly ignorant. The missile tracking system you condemn today may very well become tomorrow's cutting edge navigation system.

                        So how about that health care?
                        Last edited by marcus; 03-23-2010, 01:38 AM.

                        Comment


                          #57
                          Re: Health care bill passed

                          Holy ****, Sampson, you are literally the most ignorant person on this forum if you honestly think the military doesn't create jobs.
                          Slaves had jobs. Jobs are a means, not an end--people don't want jobs just to have jobs. We want jobs because we want what they produce. We want people to work in factories because we want the items they produce. We want programmers to write code because we want the programs. We want farmers to plant crops so we can eat. Etc.

                          The military produces one good: protection. This good has some economic value, obviously, because a country can't have a healthy industrial economy if another country can just come by and take half its resources. But, once you have enough military might to defend the country, anything further is a waste.

                          If you honestly think the military has no economic or industrial value, then I want you to take your internet modem, medicine, car, and any device that uses a satellite or tracking system and toss it out the window because I guarantee you 90% of the technology you use on a daily basis was first invented, tested, and used for military application.
                          Ah, yes, the other argument: the military invents things! As if the private sector doesn't? I'm really grateful for my military-invented light bulb, automobile, airplane, laptop...oh wait, never mind.

                          The idea that "90%" of the technology people use on a daily basis was first invented by the military is a ridiculous claim. (Since you made it, the burden of proof is on you to support it)

                          The fact that you compare Orwell's dictorship fictional society to the real world democratic republic is bad enough, but you honestly insinuate that military spending is ruining the economy and making people poor.
                          It is. The fact that you can't see how military spending impoverishes countries really, truly makes me sad. The military spent over $600B in 2008. There are about 3.5 million homeless people in this country. With that money we could literally buy them all $170,000 houses. (which is probably more than the value of the majority of the homes the people on this forum live in) And that's spending for just ONE year.

                          Fong Wong's Piston Greasers, a small business in Taiwan run by four family members, could very well be contracted to work on government vehicles in the area. If you cut back on military spending then you just killed their business.
                          *facepalm*

                          That's four family members that could be employed to grease pistons for cars. That's a building that could be used to build computers.

                          Resources are limited. There is no free lunch. If those four people are being employed by the military they can't be employed by the private sector doing something else.

                          The missile tracking system you condemn today may very well become tomorrow's cutting edge navigation system.
                          Why couldn't we just go straight for the navigation system? That would be more efficient.

                          So how about that health care?
                          Back on topic:

                          Maybe not everyone, but I sure as hell did...and a trip to the emergency room with Cobra cost me 8k plus. I have non insured friends with jobs still paying off their medical bills because they couldn't afford insurance.

                          I know you're defending your position, but you're really, really wrong on that one.
                          Do this little exercise for me: go get a health insurance quote for a 25 year old. Then, go get a health insurance quote for a 45 year old.

                          ...did you do it?

                          Ok, which was more expensive? Why?

                          Wait, so all the people who arent lucky enough to have a high paying job that provides insurance deserve to rack up insane medical bills, even though they work, they just dont deserve it because of the type of job they do?

                          or that people deserve to be rejected for having pre-existing conditions and being completely screwed even if they have a job that provides health insurance? that people suffer and die because they aren't lucky enough to have the right kind of job.

                          they just don't deserve it because of what their job is? that they aren't working for it even though they have a job? oh, its because they arent doing the right kind of work. right. yeah.

                          you actually believe that?

                          really?
                          Yes, because job quality is 100% based on random luck and is in no way indicative of merit or work ethic. Right.

                          from what I understand, the only people that are really going to be effected by this are:
                          20 somethings that are legally required to buy insurance plans that they don't need. Why do you think insurance companies welcomed this reform? Because they know that, despite the loses they will suffer covering people with pre-existing conditions, it will be offset by the money they will make selling insurance plans to young Americans who are unlikely to get sick and therefore won't use the coverage.

                          And yes, you or your buddy or your cousin or something was young and got sick and blah blah blah. But on the aggregate level, on a macro scale, young adults do not rack up medical bills.

                          Comment


                            #58
                            Re: Health care bill passed

                            Originally posted by Denmo View Post
                            Really, I think all 18 yr olds should be forced through one session of basic training. They'd have the choice afterwards to keep on in the military, benefits and all, or continue about their business. There'd be less need to spend money on military advertising, and the experience would help craft healthier, more responsible young adults (oh look I just solved health care AND the job crisis, woo).
                            Doesn't work in Korea! They're a nation of Starcraft pee-bottlers.

                            Comment


                              #59
                              Re: Health care bill passed

                              I wanna take a wiz on Sampson.

                              Then again that's never changed.

                              Comment


                                #60
                                Re: Health care bill passed

                                Originally posted by Sampson View Post
                                You don't understand economics at all.
                                Originally posted by Sampson View Post
                                You too, don't understand. So I shall go further.
                                Man, what an ineffective way to get your message across.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X