If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Call me tacky for wanting that, but to me it is glorious.
I was thinking about this computer. It's $750, with a $150 mail-in rebate. It's got a higher-end processor, a nice sized HD, and 8 Gb ram. It's STILL slower than a lot of dual-core processors I've seen though, which I've seen go to 2.9 Ghz. That one is 2.3.
If you buy an HP, make sure to buy it from HP's official store, they have stuff like $400 off coupons frequently.
Just google "HP Coupons"...Some deals going on now but not quite as good as the one we got for our HP a couple years ago
I know, it really is obnoxious, but I could spend an entire thread talking about what metallic orange has meant to me ever since I was a kid.
Can anybody help me figure out why dual-core processors can be listed at 2.9 GHz, and that quad-core was listed at 2.3? The more I look into it, the more sure I am that it's not what I originally thought. I thought it might be over-clocking, but it doesn't look that way any more.
My dual core was at 3.0ghz, and the quad-core in my new PC is at 2.6ghz. I figure since there are 4 processing cores instead of the 2, they dont have to be running as fast anymore, since they can spread the workload over 4 of them.
But I could be totally wrong, so who knows. Id love to have my i7 running at 3.0ghz though. :3
Right now I'm SERIOUSLY leaning toward the cheaper one. It's faster, it has WAY more graphics-dedicated ram, and a better (if slightly smaller) screen.
The more expensive one has 2 Gb more ram, a slightly bigger screen, and an intel chip (and graphics chipset). Those are really the only differences I can see. Everything else like the HD's are the same.
I know I'm going to have to get a better graphics card either way (and on the cheaper one I'd be plucking that 56k modem out anyway ), but I'd much rather upgrade an nvidia to an nvidia, rather than trying to supersede an intel chipset. That's what I've been doing, and it can die.
Comment