Ah, memories with better graphics!

[Vonwert]

http://www.gametrailers.com/gamepage.php?id=3474

Awesome job they did on recreating the stages.

[Kire]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

I could never stand the original because of the terrible frame rate. I might give this a go if it recieves enough good buzz.

[Red Dragon]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

Source... You have to have Steam to do that right?

No thanks...

[Jamos' Old Account]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

I really enjoyed the original, I hope they don't **** it up.

I could never stand the original because of the terrible frame rate.

What you talk'n about, Willis?

[Kire]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

What am I talking about? Well, let's see...I'm playing and the guy is on my screen. Next frame, he's gone! which way did he go? Not to mention the suckitude was multiplied by the fact that I was sectioned to a quarter of the screen.

That game had to run at 15, maybe 10 frames a second.

[Jamos' Old Account]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

Okay, I get it. That was a BIG pain.

[DK]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

Damn Kire, don't let your current hate of nintendo cloud your judgement of the classics they did.

[Kire]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

Dude, I don't hate Nintendo. Goldeneye was a decent shooter w/ 4 player, and that's more of a judgement on Rare. Hell, Perfect Dark Zero played just like Goldeneye, 'cept w/ better graphics. When it comes to "classics," you can't even come close to comparing this with Unreal Tournament or Quake II.

[Czechs Mex]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

When it comes to "classics," you can't even come close to comparing this with Unreal Tournament or Quake II.

WHAAAAAAAAAAAT?

GoldenEye 007 - N64
Avg Ratio: 96%
Based On 22 Media Outlets

Quake II - N64
Avg Ratio: 81%
Based On 22 Media Outlets

Unreal Tournament - DC
Avg Ratio: 87%
Based On 25 Media Outlets

Unreal Tournament - PS2
Avg Ratio: 77%
Based On 47 Media Outlets

Unreal Tournament - PC
Avg Ratio: 93%
Based On 22 Media Outlets

[IRC]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

What am I talking about? Well, let's see...I'm playing and the guy is on my screen. Next frame, he's gone! which way did he go? Not to mention the suckitude was multiplied by the fact that I was sectioned to a quarter of the screen.

That game had to run at 15, maybe 10 frames a second.

So you can distinguish things in a fraction of a second?

[Marc M.]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

You have to have Steam to do that right?

Actually you dont.

[Red Dragon]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

Actually you dont.

ORLY?!

Nice.

[Kire]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

That game had to run at 15, maybe 10 frames a second.

Sure, I can look at something and tell you if it's 60 or 30 fps, or if it's lower than 30 fps. The faster the gameplay is and the more important reaction time is in a game (like a first person shooter), you NEED to have at least 20-30 fps.

[Zieg Rauros]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

Quake II console versions weren't great. At all. Computer ftw. I still play it.

[IRC]

Re: Ah, memories with better graphics!

Sure, I can look at something and tell you if it's 60 or 30 fps, or if it's lower than 30 fps. The faster the gameplay is and the more important reaction time is in a game (like a first person shooter), you NEED to have at least 20-30 fps.

I'm talking about how you can see a guy appearing in one frame and disappearing in another frame when these frames are running at a fraction of a second.

I get what your saying but aren't being overly dramatic about it? I played Goldeneye and it was fun. Much more fun than being fragged by a sniper rifle five seconds into a Halo deathmatch.