Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

    I believe we have finally come to that point in human evolution where it is possible for the boob tube to either match or top the silver screen in terms of production value and quality.

    The evidence is there: many television dramas look more like a continuing Hollywood production than a TV show. Many television shows are shot in widescreen and with digital sound. Every time I tune into Lost or 24 it seems like I COULD be watching this in a movie theater. And that is an awesome feeling.

    I feel most movies are too short. That's probably why I have steered towards more TV shows as of late. I want a LONG story that has time to focus on characters. Movies usually have to jampack character development into an opening sequence, but that can also lead to some creative methods. The wedding sequence in 'The Godfather' is masterful in this arena. Many movies, however, fail hard in setting up characters properly.

    Also, television shows take more dedication than movies. With movies, you have the whole shebang already crafted, so with a little probing you can determine the overall consensus of the film. With TV, EVEN THE WRITERS ARE IN THE DARK SOMETIMES! "OK, we have a general idea, but we'll iron out the details after lunch." That takes risk and balls. And not all writers can get it done. But I love to see how well they can stay on task. Especially with a show like Lost that raises more questions than answers, you have to wonder if the writers even know what they're doing. But that's all part of the fun. And if it pays off: it PAYS OFF BIG.

    One day I WOULD like to watch TV shows in a theater with a bunch of dedicated fans. That would be really neat. I feel it would be more fun than watching a movie, and the aftertalk would be more engaging, because you could discuss what you think will happen next, whereas with a movie (unless there is positively going to be a sequel) you only have what you saw to talk about.

    I don't know. I'm probably blowing smoke here, but lately no movie has really done it for me, and right now I am really into a few TV series. So, as of right now, for me:

    TV > The Movies

    Anyone else feel the same way?
    Lil' Bean is here!

    #2
    Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

    24>anything else on TV.

    Comment


      #3
      Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

      The Wire>24
      Last edited by Garr123; 10-26-2006, 02:20 PM.
      "At first it just looked like a picture of a bunch of lily pads, but then I started scraping at it with my pocket knife and the whole painting just sort of spoke to me," Schmidt said. "For the first time, I finally understand what Monet was trying to get across in her work."

      Comment


        #4
        Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

        I don't watch any of those serial TV shows because I find their open-endedness frustrating.
        Last edited by highwind; 10-26-2006, 02:45 PM.

        Comment


          #5
          Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

          I second that.

          No, not Highwind. Crazy nut.

          Originally posted by Garr123 View Post
          The Wire>24
          That. I second that.

          24's just too ridiculously over the top for me.
          Last edited by IRC; 10-26-2006, 02:47 PM.
          The Cyclops having only one eye, needed to seek shelter from the harsh sun. The shadow cast by the spheres gave him temporary respite.

          Comment


            #6
            Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

            That and The Wire is ****ing brilliant. I think the LA or NY times called it Literary Television. It's the critics darling but no one watches it.

            Kind of like Ico was to the gaming world.
            "At first it just looked like a picture of a bunch of lily pads, but then I started scraping at it with my pocket knife and the whole painting just sort of spoke to me," Schmidt said. "For the first time, I finally understand what Monet was trying to get across in her work."

            Comment


              #7
              Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

              24 does require a high level of tolerance for the unbelievable, but I'm willing to do that to see Jack Bauer kick ass and take names.
              Lil' Bean is here!

              Comment


                #8
                Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

                Boston Legal.
                That's pretty much the only thing I've been keeping a solid track on.
                "Mindless killing doesn't do a lot for me anymore." - Sampson

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

                  I started watching 24 around the time I started watching Carnivale.

                  Carnivale was one of the most unique things I'd seen on television in a long time, 24 was creative but it was still pretty much just a crime drama on crazy sauce.

                  Carnivale got cancelled and 24 only grew in popularity.

                  I became depressed and stopped watching 24.

                  Last edited by Garr123; 10-26-2006, 03:11 PM.
                  "At first it just looked like a picture of a bunch of lily pads, but then I started scraping at it with my pocket knife and the whole painting just sort of spoke to me," Schmidt said. "For the first time, I finally understand what Monet was trying to get across in her work."

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

                    At this point in my life, I'm not a fan of either.
                    Eat Smello.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

                      I'm into 24, Lost, Deadwood, Heroes, South Park, and My Name is Earl.

                      Deadwood I have to watch on DVD because I don't have HBO. I've rented to whole first season, and I just started watching the second.

                      The first season of Deadwood is one of the strongest seasons of any show I've seen. I was hooked the whole way through. Some people are turned off by the profanity, but I wasn't affected by it. I love the character of Al Swearengen. He's just about the perfect villain: evil, but not TOO evil. I love it when some of his sympathetic tendency poke through.

                      The second season of Deadwood...I don't know. I still like it, but I think the writers went too far to make it sound "Shakespearian". Even the ruffians are being too profound and preachy. Some scenes are nearly unwatchable because they seem "forced". But...I've only seen four episodes, so maybe things will mellow out later.

                      Anyways, I'd recommend Deadwood to anyone.
                      Last edited by Funk; 10-26-2006, 03:14 PM.
                      Lil' Bean is here!

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

                        I've always felt that way, with the exception of the crappy stuff that's on TV of course. I like the serial nature of TV, things grow and develop, situations can affect the characters years into the future not just a short time like most movies portray. Especially with the shows that make certain to maintain continuity with everything that's come before. Movies are like one story out of a character's life, TV series give you several stories, from the big story arcs to the single episode plots.
                        I want that Mulan McNugget sauce, Morty!

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

                          Deadwood and Carnivale were my two favorite TV shows and made me realise how much HBO rocked. Season 2 of Deadwood was eh, but season 3 made up for everything.

                          If you like Deadwood I'd suggest trying to rent season 1 of Carnivale.


                          Oh yeah. Rome is quite amazing as well. You can find the whole series on Daily Motion right now, don't know how long it'll be up though: http://www.dailymotion.com/visited/search/Rome/1
                          Last edited by Garr123; 10-26-2006, 03:35 PM.
                          "At first it just looked like a picture of a bunch of lily pads, but then I started scraping at it with my pocket knife and the whole painting just sort of spoke to me," Schmidt said. "For the first time, I finally understand what Monet was trying to get across in her work."

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

                            Originally posted by Garr123 View Post
                            That and The Wire is ****ing brilliant. I think the LA or NY times called it Literary Television. It's the critics darling but no one watches it.

                            Kind of like Ico was to the gaming world.
                            What critics are you talking about? Are they the same ones who call Battlestar Galactica the best show on TV now?

                            Because it is. It is also better than the movies.

                            So start watching, jerks.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Re: IMHO, as of RIGHT NOW: TV > The Movies

                              Los Angeles Times devoted an entire editorial to how much The Wire kicked ass.

                              From wiki:

                              Entertainment Weekly named The Wire the best show of 2004, describing it as "the smartest, deepest and most resonant drama on TV." They credited the complexity of the show for its poor ratings.

                              TV Guide wrote that with the return of the show, "The Wire reclaims its place in the top tier of American drama."

                              The Los Angeles Times took the rare step of devoting an editorial to the show, stating that "even in what is generally acknowledged to be a something of a golden era for thoughtful and entertaining dramas — both on cable channels and on network TV — The Wire stands out."

                              The website Metacritic, which gathers reviews from published news sources and translates them into a percentage score, has assigned to The Wire's fourth season a weighted average score of 98%, the highest for any television show since Metacritic began tracking them in 2005
                              Last edited by Garr123; 10-26-2006, 03:49 PM.
                              "At first it just looked like a picture of a bunch of lily pads, but then I started scraping at it with my pocket knife and the whole painting just sort of spoke to me," Schmidt said. "For the first time, I finally understand what Monet was trying to get across in her work."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X