Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie <-redundant

[Sage of Creation]

So I'm curious...

1: I'm worried about ****ing people off for posting in old threads. What's oldest a thread can be before the ****ing-Off-of-People will happen?

2: If it's a topic that I really want to comment on but it has already been posted, but that thread is really old, can I post the topic again?

An example. I have an opinion about a certain, recent RPG Maker game
*cough* rpgmaker3*cough* that I REAAALLY want to share with you guys, but there's already a thread that kinda does that and the last time it was posted on was about a month ago...

So what the hell should I do?
Post in old thread? Create new thread?
Oh, dear god, my head's starting to explode...

[jvrlopez]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

I wouldnt make a big deal out of such a trivial thing.

The worst that can happen is your post will get deleted or people will mention how you brought up something old.

Besides that, theres no real limit I can think of, unless it gets so old its no longer archieved on the back pages. But if it is a few pages back and a month or so old (as you say) you could either reply in it and bump it back up or just post a new topic (it's old, so it wouldnt seem that repetitive).

Just go with the flow.

[Valkysas]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

1: I'm worried about ****ing people off for posting in old threads. What's oldest a thread can be before the ****ing-Off-of-People will happen?

No one is going to be upset. if we didnt want anyone posting in old topics, we wouldnt keep every single topic ever created on the forum open.

2: If it's a topic that I really want to comment on but it has already been posted, but that thread is really old, can I post the topic again?

if it's not on the first two pages, don't worry about it. go ahead and make a new topic, or reply to the old one if you want

An example. I have an opinion about a certain, recent RPG Maker game
*cough* rpgmaker3*cough* that I REAAALLY want to share with you guys, but there's already a thread that kinda does that and the last time it was posted on was about a month ago...

again, if it's not on the first two pages, don't worry about it.

[DarkwingChuck]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

If anyone complains about you either starting a new thread for an old topic or bumping up and old thread it's probably just one of our resident b****ers. Don't worry it's their job to get po'ed about little things, they have a quota to me so don't take it personally.

[Caciss]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

Even I don't get ****ed over things like that.

[Smurf Taco]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

Just don't s*** a **** out your *** while your **** is ****ing outside your **** with her ***s hanging out.

[Sage of Creation]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

Thanks guys! I feel a lot better about things now. I'll even try going for a record of 1,000 posts in a day. ... oh, alright, maybe not.

[hitogoroshi]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

Let this post fester for a couple weeks then bump it.
It'll be ironic.

[hitogoroshi]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

Irony sutiably achievied.

[ErikaFuzzbottom]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

Huh, must've missed this topic somehow...

I'll even try going for a record of 1,000 posts in a day.

To do that, you'd have to spam, and spamming is against the rules. But I'm sure you knew that already.

[Garr123]

Re: Questions for a forum impaired forum junkie &lt;-redundant

It's not the number of posts it's the quality. I was on the old forums for years and only had 2,000 posts.

My point is that spam doesn't have one.