Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

[IRC]

Can we just give Terr his own forum or something?

[Nixon]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

Transportation is a big issue right now and each topic deals with a different aspect of it.

[DarkwingChuck]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

Of course we don't need six topics but if people are posting in them then someone obviously wants them there.

[Ryner]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

Can we just give Terr his own forum or something?

That'd be funny.

[tjoris9]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

Oh, come on! Cut the man some slack! I counted just now and there's only 4 on the front page, with 2 of them probably slipping into the obscurity of page 2 any minute now.

And, BTW, TC does have his own forum, he just feels that his posts should be where everyone can access them easily, and because it has almost nothing to do with Police State.

[Redneck 2000]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

[Alzar]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

Do we really need this topic? It seems like a really stupid topic made by a known pavilion whiner.

[IRC]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

I count electric cars as oil related since you can use them to "stick it to the oil companies." And I'm suggesting we give him his own little "oil companies are screwing the world" forum.

And no we don't Alzar, but at least I only made one of them.

[Caciss]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

I'm sure if anyone cared about his posts, they'd check his forum.

And everybody else doesn't want his post, and won't check the forum.

So, everyone wins.

[DK]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

You could just not check the topics that are posted.

[Valkysas]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

they're not repeat topics, or spam, nor is he flaming any pavilion members. they're fine.

[Toaster]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

Sheesh, you don't need to be so serious.



Anyways, I think Terr is brilliant. I can barely manage to read through most of his posts. But they defeniatly show his I.Q.

I'm gonna be dissapointed in him if he deson't go really far in life. And I don't mean to sound all melodramatic. I really mean it. He's got a hell of a lot of potentiol.

[Crustyrailgun]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

While I agree theres no harm and no foul. It also wouldn't hurt him to just put all the articles into one topic, like one, then some reaction, then another, and so on and so forth. That way people can talk about the real important topics... like... uh... Pavilionish serious topics...

[The Toecutter]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

If people don't like what I post, it's their choice whether or not to read it. Some people will read them, others won't. Each topic covered an entirely different aspect, and to post them all in one topic would make everything cluttered and difficult to find for those who are interested in the information and/or opinions present.

[Alex]

Re: Do we really need six topics about oil and oil related stuff on the front page?

I used to be bitter about it, then I actually read the articles, and the discussions.

Arrrr. If I'm not in a Terrorist mood, I'll just stay away.



Plus, we're in an interesting time. More interesting articles and discussions.