If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Granted, Fox News has that doughy jackass Glenn Beck, but c'mon guys. He's the President. You kind of owe him respect. Not only that, constantly interrupting somebody when they speak just reveals your unwillingness to hear what they say. It's rude and childish. I mean, look at his stare in that picture. That's like giving Harold Ford disrespect.
What's the point of having an emergency response system if you can't provoke the wrath of God?
I give him a year, tops before Obama goes straight up gangsta on Fox News. Articulate black man, huh? The next person who calls him a commie better watch out... I've got a feeling he can throw down old-school Chicago style.
And you KNOW Michelle would have his back; a black woman don't take **** from anyone, but they STAND by their men! Uh huh, I know THAT'S right!
Actually, after watching the interview in its entirety, I really can't blame the reporter at all. Obama literally skips virtually all of his questions and gives lengthy 1-2 minute answers that are off topic.
That said, it is all just partisan bull****. To quote Baier, the guy who interviewed Obama: "(GWB gave) some of the most visionary and eloquent speeches ever delivered by an American President"
Fox News is nothing but cheap sensationalism and yellow journalism. And I say that as someone with right-leaning political views. I don't respect Fox News at all.
It's only balanced in the fact that there are plenty of liberal journalists who are just as dishonest and irresponsible. It doesn't make it right though.
Actually, after watching the interview in its entirety, I really can't blame the reporter at all. Obama literally skips virtually all of his questions and gives lengthy 1-2 minute answers that are off topic.
What I saw from the full interview is usually a case of "that question
was bull**** and here's why," I've never seen a journalist interrupt a
President mid sentence with an unrelated straw man argument. I'll
agree that sometimes he was dancing around the answer (of course he's
not going to say his opinion on what's to happen next on a vote that
hasn't even gone through yet, he's not stupid), but a lot of times mid
answer he would be interrupted with a different question.
I saw the Bush/Cheney Fox interviews (and others) and they were never
inurrupted and gave lengthy answers as well. It's just a stark
contrast to what I've seen compared to the last 10 years of
journalists talking to the President.
Respect for the opposition? Please, you're not going to get that from either side in today's political climate.
I'm aware of that, but no matter who was interviewing George W., they gave him the respect he deserved as the President of the United States. I've seen videos of Clinton interviews after the whole Monica Lewinski business and they gave him more respect. This is just unacceptable. No matter who you're interviewing, you're supposed to give them the respect they deserve. Unless, of course, you're the king of Super-Liberal giga douches:
As an interviewer, the man should have waited until Obama was finished, and then posed a question that would lead him back to it. He did not need to cut him off mid-sentence like a smug teenager in a religous debate.
What's the point of having an emergency response system if you can't provoke the wrath of God?
their intention is not to report news, but distort it and present it in a way that furthers the conservative republican agenda.
I think it's more distort the news so that their sponsors are more happy with them. It just so happens that the Republican party likes giving tax cuts and other things to larger companies. I'm sure if if Donkey Democrat Gay Ice Cream gave Fox a sixty-million dollar deal that you would see a shift in their programming.
But that's just pure speculations with no actual facts...
Comment