RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

[Ixzion]

Check out the Mag frontpage for some info from the review.

http://www.rpgmmag.com

[DarkwingChuck]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

A Mature rating? What's that about? The other two were rated for Everyone.

[Valkysas]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

it confused me too, because agetec's product page says that it's "ideal for children".

[Doyleman]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

7.0 is better than what RPGM2 got....
On the magazine that Gamespot gives out *I forget the name*, it got a 5.

[AbstractOrigin]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

Wow.

The ESRB sucks.

I'm really wondering what is RPGM3 rated M about?

[Marc M.]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

PSM just misprinted it. Happens sometimes.
It is rated E.

[AbstractOrigin]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine



That's funny.

[Rodak]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

The mature rating could come from the fact that you can create conversations about mature themes which, in a commercially released game would earn it that rating.

It is a truly absurd reason, but we have a Republican controlled White Houese, Congress, and Senate. So it makes sense.

I think.

And they can't be too careful these days.

I miss the 1960's.

Peace.

+++++++++
EDIT
+++++++

PSM just misprinted it. Happens sometimes.
It is rated E.

Thanks, you posted that while I was typing.

[ErikaFuzzbottom]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

highly customizable

Do they have any idea what they're talking about?

[DarkwingChuck]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

If you judge RM3 individually rather than compairing it to the other two it is very customizable. Think aobut it from the perspective of someone who hasn't played RPG Maker before. You'd be impressed with the customization of it. I think PSM was writing the review for those people since everyone already in the RPG Maker community would already know about the game.

[Walrus]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

"RPG Maker 3 will use 45 human character models, 45 buildings (each building has an inside and outside model)"

Does this mean you can't make your own buildings from scratch? Because that would be really lame.

[DarkwingChuck]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

I'm pretty sure you can't make buildings from scratch from what's been said before. But I'm actually happy about it. Making buildings has been the main thing that keeps me from ever completing a game. If I make one with RM2 I'll most likely only use the premade buildings. I know it's a bummer for people who like making their own though.

[Walrus]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

I really hope that's not the case. If it is, I doubt I'll be getting it when it's released. That's just way too limiting for me. I could've worked around the other limitations, but designing the buildings and structures was one of my favorite parts of the last two RPGMs.

[Necromancy]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

I'm with Lord on this one. Not having to build buildings will really help me along.

[tjoris9]

Re: RPG Maker 3 reviewed in PlayStation Magazine

I think being able to create buildings was pretty good, but there's also nothing wrong with having a nice database of premade material. Still, if RM3 has a great set of buildings, I'll have no complaints.