"Mario and Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" (Out now...or Tuesday))

[Bon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7FHblGBVQM

Just from the preview below, I want this game. I'm really hoping that I will get into this title better than Partners in Time, and sadly, I haven't even finished it yet. Just a few more months to go. You guys can wait...right?

[Bon]

Re: The Official "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread

Japanese art cover:



IGN preview:

http://ds.ign.com/articles/945/945471p1.html

[John Mora]

Re: The Official "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread

So who actually makes these, cuz I know it's not Nintendo.

[Toaster]

Re: The Official "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09)

Pavilion Pet Peeve #1: Dubbing a thread "official"

Just ****ing call it Mario & Luigi 3.

[Bon]

Re: The Official "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09)

I really don't see the big deal. There are other "official" threads in this forum. Oh well.

[Valkysas]

Re: The Official "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread

So who actually makes these, cuz I know it's not Nintendo.

One of nintendo's internal developers, alphadream.

so yes, it is nintendo. the same way a sonic team game is made by sega.

[John Mora]

Re: The Official "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread

Oho~

[DarkwingChuck]

Re: The Official "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread

Since when is that a pet peeve? I thought it was encouraged to avoid multiple topics about something.

[Perversion]

Re: "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09 O_O)

To me, the inclusion of, "Official" in the title of a topic indicates, "Hey, guys...I'm the first one to make this topic, and if the game becomes big, that means MY TOPIC will get tons of posts. So do not make another topic for the same game, because I made mine first, and called mine, 'Official.'"

I think that's what my little pal Toastie is getting at.


And when I made my Rock Band DLC topic, I purposely poked fun at this phenomenon by calling it, "I hesitantly refer to this as the Official Rock Band DLC thread."



On topic, I played and loved the GBA game, but never got the DS one. I never particularly cared for baby Marios or baby Luigis in any game. Then again, I've never played any game with a baby Mario either.

[Loki]

Re: "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09 O_O)

Y-Yoshi's Island!

[Perversion]

Re: "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09 O_O)

Never played an SNES Mario game. Same reason I never played an SNES RPG or the SNES versions of Zelda or Metroid...my SNES collection consisted mainly of strategy games or SRPGs.

Got back on board with the franchises on the N64.

[marcus]

Re: "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09 O_O)

Hopefully the world is a bit better in terms of design. While the first game was still linear, it felt like you had more control over where you went because the level design wasn't so confining. The second game was literally "here's the next path go there now."

I did love the bosses, though, especially the fights with Bowser.

[Magus]

Re: "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09 O_O)

Never played an SNES Mario game. Same reason I never played an SNES RPG or the SNES versions of Zelda or Metroid...

Goddammit, is Photobucket virus-free yet?

>>>

[Bon]

Re: "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09 O_O)

Goddammit, is Photobucket virus-free yet?

>>>

Um...relevance here?

[Perversion]

Re: "Mario and Luigi 3" Thread (Update: 1/24/09 O_O)

Come on, Bonanza....this is the RPG Maker Pavilion, Magus quoted me, and is distraught that Photobucket is infested with viruses. Does anything here ever REALLY stay 100% on topic? You've been posting here long enough to know that as long as a topic does not get wholesale derailed, a bit of witty banter and playful ribbing within any given topic is perfectly acceptable, nay, encouraged. It allows us to get to know each other a bit better, and come together as the happy family we are. Or something.