If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The interesting reality about this case is that the ruling is based less on what the game is really about and more on how people play the game. Most missions require you to kill people, but it's mostly the same kind of violence involved in any other game. There are a couple of elements that encourage violence and other elements that make it an M-rated game (Rampages pay you to kill a certain number of gang members in a given period of time, you can regain health by having sex with hookers), but what seems to really tick off these people is the gratuitous violence perpetrated by the players.
This reminds me of that movie where that white guy gos around acting like he's black, and joins that gang.
He unloads two full clips, holding two machine guns, into a rival gangs car. Then one guys asks him where he learned those moves. He says "Grand Theft Auto 3 dawg."
You're thinknig of Malibu's Most Wanted. Yeah, that one nigga' had Gamecast!
I cannot stand censorship cases like the one above. In America, the SUV driving security moms end up getting upset and then seek to impose upon everyone else's civil liberties and become reviled with disgust at the thought of watching what their own children play. Interesting to see how other nations adress this problem. Sadly, their rationale is still not legitamate one iota...
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder." ~ Thomas Jefferson
Comment