Analyzing the Analysts

[DarkwingChuck]

Kotaku's put together part 1 of an in-depth piece examining what the game analysts do and how well they do it.



Looks like 60% is as good as it gets. May as well be asking a Magic 8-Ball.

[Translucid]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

I think kotaku needs a spelling analyst

[Kire]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN

[Karr Lord of Chaos]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

an interesting article, definitely worth a read through.

the watchers watching the watchers' of the watchers will be in charge of watching the watchers' watchers, naturally.

[marcus]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

They misspelled industry. That alone makes me not want to read the article.

[DarkwingChuck]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

Yes. How dare they have typos! We simply can't tolerate it.

[Stormy]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

Typos in an article are just laziness, ever heard of spellchecker? Or better yet, actually proofreading the article? In a forum it can be excused, because its informal, but that is not the case here.

[DarkwingChuck]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

When did blogs get to be so formal?

[Chad]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

I have to agree, they SHOULD use proper grammar.

[Karr Lord of Chaos]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

maybe the article writer is my long lost father...

or just another guy who sucks at the english language.

either way the editor needs to get shot.

[Vanilla Iced Tea]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

Wow! That's really boring.

[Gustaff 13]

Re: Analyzing the Analysts

Wowie... look who's talking.

Anyway. I and U are soooo close together. I forgive you, Kotaku!