Well there you have it. (Politics)

[Denmo]

Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter are supporting Hillary.

Why?

Limbaugh is operating under the assumption that the Republican party -- now represented by presumptive nominee John McCain -- would have a better chance of retaining the White House if anti-Hillary fervor drives GOP voters to the polls in November.

If there was ever a reason not to vote for Hillary, I think this is one.

Here's an article that predicted this would happen almost a week ago.

Against McCain, she [Hillary] and she alone enables the Republicans to forget their deep internal divisions and unite. Nothing – nothing – unites them as she does. The money she will raise for the Republicans is close to the amount they can raise for themselves. If you’re a hard-nosed Democrat, especially in a state that leans Republican or that voted for Bush, she is potentially toxic to your chances.

So basically at this point, a vote for Hillary is a vote for McCain.

[Kire]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

my parents are life long Republicans and they almost voted for Obama in the primaries because they preferred to have him instead of Hillary if we have a Dem president.

[Red Dragon]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

Obama has no experience as anyone though.

Yeah he is a smooth talker, but that's it.

I would rather have Hillary, at least she has a former president as a husband.

In reality though I hate all the canidates.

[Kire]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

Hillary has so much experience, that she pretty much ran out of money and had a mystery $5 million pop up that people are questioning. Meanwhile, Obama has $37 million left for the final stretch. Just food for thought.

[Karr Lord of Chaos]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

Hillary has so much experience, that she pretty much ran out of money and had a mystery $5 million pop up that people are questioning. Meanwhile, Obama has $37 million left for the final stretch. Just food for thought.

so hillary is either driving a bigger campeign tour or she needs to fire her financial manager, not real important.

the experience obama lacks is political experience, not campaign experience, though he lacks that too. to fix the mess bush left, your going to need someone who knows what they are doing.

[Valkysas]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

he doesnt lack political experience. he went into the illinois senate in 1997 and was there until 2004.

clinton is in the senate of new york as of 2001. they both have seven years experience with that. wait, no. clinton has six years, because she really hasnt been an active senator this past year. on snap.

hillary doesnt have any more political experience than him. she has more experience being a wife of a political figure than obama. that really doesnt count for anything.

unless you want to count her fake insurance reform crusdade years ago that promptly ended when the insurance companies adder her to their government payroll. yeah, they own her.

she has more experience being a corrupt political figurehead than obama does. maybe that's important.

[Loki]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

I was trying to find a way to word just that. Thanks, Valk.

[Funk]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

hillary doesnt have any more political experience than him. she has more experience being a wife of a political figure than obama. that really doesnt count for anything.

Way to spit on Eleanor Roosevelt's legacy.

[Karr Lord of Chaos]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

" What is experience? Previous presidents have been governors, or had a longer term in the Senate or House, before taking office."

thats what im pointing to, the draw to hilary who also may not have enough experience, though her husband served two terms in office and would be a valuable asset with hilary as president which makes up for the missing experience.

[Valkysas]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

Obama has had a longer stay in the senate than her.

her husband being a president doesnt make up for her lack of experience, since we're not voting for him. because she wasnt president. while he was in office, she was busy selling herself out to any company that would open their checkbooks. she wasnt involved with the political aspects at all back then.

[Karr Lord of Chaos]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

Obama has had a longer stay in the senate than her.

her husband being a president doesnt make up for her lack of experience, since we're not voting for him. because she wasnt president. while he was in office, she was busy selling herself out to any company that would open their checkbooks. she wasnt involved with the political aspects at all back then.

ive said my piece, you clearly dont like hilary so nothing i will say will change that. im very sure she had involvement with her husbands work.

[Valkysas]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

Yeah, I don't like her.

I don't see how anyone even remotely knowledgable about her past can like her.

She's a terrible person. Even now she's pressing the health care thing again, which if she is elected, will no doubt turn into another meaningless bill being passed, her getting a crapload more money, and insurance rates going up again.

[Karr Lord of Chaos]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

Yeah, I don't like her.

I don't see how anyone even remotely knowledgable about her past can like her.

She's a terrible person.

what you call terrible is just what the business is like. she wants to make money so she is doing everything in her power to do so, even selling herself out. she has to work very hard to overcome her partners shadow. he had a very good political career and hilary has/is working hard to overcome that. i also believe that mistakes in the past should not destroy a persons future. id vote for her based on what i would get now, not what she did 10 years ago. i think she has what it takes to get the job done which is precisely what id vote for.

i wouldnt vote for obama, he seems too "green" for my taste. could just be the rhetoric spin getting to me, but i genuinely believe america isnt ready for him yet. give him another term of experience, something where you acually see him preforming and he will be a shoe in at the next presidential race.


as a side note i wonder how many will vote this year. i hope it will be a larger turnout then the last few elections. people need to go vote. anything that get people out voting is a good thing.

[Valkysas]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

and thankfully, you cannot vote.



I'm sure you wouldnt want me helping to make decisions about canada, only going based on the media's spin on things and no actual research.

[Karr Lord of Chaos]

Re: Well there you have it. (Politics)

no research? hardly, what i dont want to do is say something too out there. i really dont want to do research for a post here. you people jump all over anyone who says something without having 50 fact sheets to prove it. i can assure you, my vote for hilary is not based solely on media spin.

the two things you can never talk about are religion and politics, everyone will hold a different view and defend it to death as if it where a god given gospel.