Good lord.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17134607...15829?GT1=9033
The women is saying that they were the result of spyware pop ups, but the jury thought otherwise.
I really see no reason for her to do such a thing and I think the jury just got sweet talked into a guilty verdict on a subject they probably know little about.
As for a spybot/adaware scan?

I remember in 7th grade, we were huddled around the computer looking for sites related to the subject at hand and we too got porn pop ups. I'd say its nothing uncanny and to convict a teacher of a crime that has the potential of 40 years imprisonment is a little extreme.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17134607...15829?GT1=9033
The women is saying that they were the result of spyware pop ups, but the jury thought otherwise.
I really see no reason for her to do such a thing and I think the jury just got sweet talked into a guilty verdict on a subject they probably know little about.
As for a spybot/adaware scan?
“What is extraordinary is the prosecution admitted there was no search made for spyware — an incredible blunder akin to not checking for fingerprints at a crime scene,” Alex Eckelberry, president of a Florida software company, wrote recently in the local newspaper. “When a pop-up occurs on a computer, it will get shown as a visited Web site, and no ‘physical click’ is necessary.”

I remember in 7th grade, we were huddled around the computer looking for sites related to the subject at hand and we too got porn pop ups. I'd say its nothing uncanny and to convict a teacher of a crime that has the potential of 40 years imprisonment is a little extreme.



Comment